Tuesday 20 December 2011

Possible Location For Flashback Murder Scene









Here are some images I took earlier of a possible location I feel would be good for the flashback murder scene, since our scene will not be too graphic (I.E the audience will only see the aftermath as opposed to the actual killing) I think this wont cause any disturbances from people walking by. The final two images I have edited with an app on my phone, I know this will probably not show up on camera however I just wanted to show it (it could be good as some sort of promotional poster, although this will probably not be developed).

Strengths
There are many strengths to this location, firstly shopping centres are incredibly close so access to food and drink will be very easy for anyone who requires it. Throughout the area there are many parts which have graffiti and very dark imagery which could be interpreted as something else such as the 7th image which could look like bloodied hand prints, this should help create a dark atmosphere towards the audience and make them feel anticipated for the murder which is about to happen. There are also many tiles across the walls which are loose thus creating a dreary and uncertain atmosphere. Overall I feel this would be an almost perfect place for our project as it creates a variety of relevant atmospheres, there is also a link to other classic crime films as I found that films like Psycho and Casino Royale all have death scenes in bathrooms and since this area has a layout similar to a bathroom it could allow us to link to these films when talking about the sequence in more depth once the project is complete.

Weaknesses
Unfortunately there are a few weaknesses and threats towards this area, the most notable and lucrative one is the fact that a reasonable amount of people use this tunnel in order to get to the supermarkets (as mentioned before), this means there is a possibility that people could get in the way whilst we are filming and there is also a risk that they could get disturbed about us using this area for a murder scene, even though the actual murder (in our case via stabbing) will not be shown and will only be alluded to.

Conclusion
Me, Barry and Katie still need to discuss other potential places and areas however I think I will be pushing for us to use this area as the shear amount of strengths I feel outweigh the weaknesses. However, as stated before we still need to discuss other areas.

Sunday 18 December 2011

Fake Blood

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0rbtQGQ4iE

Here is a link to a video from YouTube which redeems the best way to create fake blood for films, it is highly necessary that we have some parts of fake blood in our sequence as we need to highlight at one point that a character is dead and to do this fake blood is an absolute necessity, I have already attempted another method in which me and a family member improvised using an array of equipment from the kitchen in her house, however that did not end up looking as good as this as we discovered it is very hard to get a very rich, dark red colour so I have decided to use this video as a basis for the materials we will use

Saturday 17 December 2011

Secession Studios Permission Print Screen

Here is a print screen taken from my home computer of the email I sent to Secession Studios asking for his permission to use his music in our clip, you can also see his reply just above my first email on the left side of the page. I have included this just to ensure that we do have permission from website to use his music. I have not cropped the photo at all so that you can be sure I have made no edits towards this so hopefully you will be able to see his full reply.

The Departed Opening Sequence

Slightly late I know however I did say I would complete an analysis of The Departed opening sequence so here it is.

The Departed is a 2006 film which tells the confusing story of a policeman who is working for the mafia, whilst at the same time an undercover policeman poses as a member of the mafia. The setting of the Departed is Boston, this indicates that the mafia is the Irish Mafia; this differs from usual crime films as the mafia used is typically the Italian Mafia. The use of using a different mafia group highlights that this film is going to be very different to usual crime films. Jack Nicholson plays the Irish Mob boss and is the prominent part of the ensemble cast as he is the one which links everyone in the film together.

The opening sequence begins directly with a flashback whilst a voiceover of Jack plays. The actual film is set in the present time whereas this flashback begins around the 1970s, this can be told by the mise-en-scene of the cars used throughout the sequence. The use of the flashback is used to highlight the story between the policeman (Matt Damon) and how he met the Irish Mafia boss as a child. It is interesting that Matt Damon’s character’s parents are never shown throughout the film, this gives the sense that the mafia boss (Jack Nicholson) has taken the place of Matt Damon’s parents, using mafia bosses as father-figures is typical in crime drama, most notably The Godfather in which Marlon Brando’s character (Godfather) is seemingly a father-figure to everyone besides his enemies. The use of the father-figure can be used for a number of reasons; usually it is done to make the audience feel as though the character is more sympathetic and heroic as father-figures are usually shown to be heroic and a protector of their children. However it can also be done to highlight that they are manipulating their children and brainwashing them into doing the wrong thing instead of the right thing thus contradicting the one thing policeman need to know. This can then either make the audience sympathetic towards Matt Damon’s character as he has not necessarily chosen to be sinister and conniving, however it could also make him seem very sinister as he has grown up with evil around him and will thus act in a very sinister way with no remorse for anyone, not having remorse or sympathy will highlight to the characters that Matt Damon’s character is sinister as sympathy is a typical feature for heroic characters. I have discussed this typical father-figure concept as I feel it would be an interesting area to explore in our project; however it will be difficult as we only have 3 members in our group all of which all have roles already allocated towards them, this will mean we will need someone who is relatively older (as for a father-figure they need to be notably older) and willing to act which will be difficult to find. I also discussed this as there are numerous elements from the actual opening sequence which dwells on the father-figure relationship between Matt Damon’s character as a child and Jack Nicolson’s mafia boss character.

As the clip opens the audience can see the setting of the sequence as well as the fact that it is set in the past through text which states “Boston, some years ago”, the use of the actual years being unspecified highlights a casual atmosphere and also indicates the notion that not many understand exactly what happened in this sequence within the present time of the film.

The clip then cuts to fighting amongst a street with a voiceover from Jack Nicholson, his distinctive voice indicates his presence to the audience at 0:08, the use of him talking over a fight scene could show how Jack’s character may have started the fighting, he talks very casually as though seeing destruction is an everyday occurrence, the camera during the first fight does not have any edits which replicates the point of view of the people watching the fight and makes the audience feel as though they are part of the environment, I think using point of view shots would be good in our final project as it entices the audience and makes them feel part of the environment.

There are then shots of police officers whilst a school bus drives alongside them which then cuts towards more fighting. This creates a sense of rebellion and how the public is fighting against the police (I.E authority).

0:44 is the first time the audience see Jack, the shot is very interesting as the camera pans whilst he is walking around in some sort of broken down factory or mechanics, the lighting is interesting as Jack’s body is kept very dark whilst the lighting of the outside is much brighter, this makes it seem as though Jack’s figure is like a silhouette which replicates his old-fashioned views and also shows how Jack’s character is very dark and villainous. Having the villainous character encompassed as a dark, silhouette-type figure could be difficult to replicate, however I feel is we were to attempt this within our project it would be very effective and would also allow us to discuss practical elements around it as well as typical representation of dark characters.

Jack is then seen to be smoking a cigarette whilst also saying the word “nigger”, this emphasizes that he is a very dark character through the racist language, the cigarette reflects a rebellious nature. He expresses that he has a belief that if no one gives you what you want “you have to take it”, this shows him as a more aggressive and violent character and shows that he is willing to do almost anything to get what he wants.

The audience are then greeted to Matt Damon’s character as a young child, before Jack meets him he is seen to take money off a restaurant owner, he then directs a young bar lady in the restaurant to come over to him, the language he uses to her is very misogynistic and replicates that he is possibly a racist and sexist character thus emphasizing his villainous nature.

Jack then starts talking to the kid, he directs the barman to get the kid accessories such as milk and comic books. This makes him seem generous towards the audience however the camera angles (specifically at 2:23 and 2:33) which show him looking down on the kid as though he clearly has authority whilst the kid is very weak and also shows him in very dark lighting which subsequently emphasizes his dark character further, being generous indicates the father and son type relationship Jack and the kid has at this point. Through dialogue it is clear that the kid lives with his grandma and not therefore not his parents, therefore when Jack begins talking to him it gives the sense that Jack is replacing the father-figure in the kid's life. Jack then expresses that he did well in school which he calls a “paradox”, this indicates that this movie will not show a typical representation that all mafia bosses are complete thugs who had a very hard upbringing and lived their lives on the streets, instead it simply shows him in a more respectable light, however the use of the lighting indicates that he is still a dark character.

At 3:42 there is a shock moment as the sequence jump cuts directly from Jack giving advice to the kid straight to Jack shooting an unspecified man and woman, this highlights that Jack is not ‘all talk’ in terms of his villainous ways and does not care about killing people if he feels it is necessary, he mocks the way the woman fell as she died thus indicating further how he does not care at all about woman’s rights or about killing people.






Jack in his silhouette type image thus indicating his dark nature towards the audience.

A shot taken from 2:23, this clearly indicates how Jack is the authority figure whilst the kid is very weak within a high angle shot, Jack is also in very dark light whilst the kid is in much brighter light thus showing Jack as a much darker character whilst the kid is more innocent at this moment in time.



Glass Shot experiment 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VU1vqxsTV7c&feature=g-upl&context=G21b78cbAUAAAAAAAAAA

Here is a video I made using an app on my phone called iTimeLapse, this allows me to accomplish time lapse shots that would otherwise take all day, I think time lapse shots would be very useful in our project as they create a disorienting factor and also replicate a drunken feel, this is good as our character is supposed to be drunk at this point, this is just an experiment so obviously the background, glass etc will all change, this was mainly to see if I could use the app effectively, I understand the primary purpose of the app is to show how time passes quickly over one area however I feel it is very effective within a shot like this and could help us explain the characters feelings at this point without the use of dialogue as this will become a POV shot. I think it looks ok, after all the shot is supposed to be very quick and disorienting so excuse the fact that the clip is only 4 seconds long, overall it took me about 2 minutes to film this which when compressed only comes out as roughly 4 seconds, however this was literally just the first time I used to app so hopefully I will get better. This has also prompted me to think about whether it would be good to film a few sequences on my phone (just shots like this in which it would be hard to replicate using a proper video camera), I can upload the videos to YouTube (such as what I've done with this sequence) and then we can simply download the video from YouTube and save it as whatever file is necessary to use in our project.

By the way I am sorry for filming the shot in portrait, this is my fault but it can easily be changed to landscape next time.

Friday 16 December 2011

Draft Script

Here is a drafted script (details concerning script, representation will be discussed in more depth over the holidays) that we think would be good to include for our final project:

First shot should be something very sophisticated but simple, plot goes as follows

Detective sits opposite a prisoner (can’t see detectives face, prisoners face is bright white looking sickly)

Cuts to black, voiceover of detective asking questions

Quick flashbacks to situation (POV shots of prisoners view showing innocent girl having alcohol with the prisoner)

Cuts back and from interrogation and flashback

Point of view shot of prisoner, girl looking worried in close up, then loud noise (baseball bat hitting something really hard), then camera falls on the floor (still in POV, trying to show prisoner falling down from big hit)

Camera then cuts back interrogation, prisoner states he does not know what happened next
Camera goes in flashback anyway, high angle on two bodies, there is no voiceover at this point, just music, prisoner is lying down with a baseball bat beside him whilst girl has knife wounds with blood, camera then pans up to show a new man, he is looking angry and has a knife with blood in his hands
The camera then cuts back to the flashback where there is the man point of view and shows to be knocking out the prisoner and killing the girl (optional)
The man then drags the prisoners body towards the girl and places the knife which killed the girl in the prisoners hand
Camera then cuts to black and fades back into the interrogation, prisoner has hands in his head and then looks up, close up on interrogator (his face is in the shadows and cannot be seen), the interrogator then moves forward and shows his face, the audience can now see that he is the man who killed the girl and knocked out the prisoner


Interrogation – Black and white


Flashbacks – Colour


Titles - Should be very simple but sophisticated, possibly a high angle shot on a simple cup of tea whilst a mid-shot of interrogator wearing a suit picks it up as the titles show in amidst with what’s shown on screen, only use colours black and white for titles.

Final Day of Research

Alas, this is the last day I can focus on my research for my crime-drama/crime-thriller project, unfortuately I forgot to add The Departed Opening Sequence to my memory stick, therefore I will finish it at the end of the day when I get home. I will also be printing off more questionnaires for my family to fill in today which should allow me to gain a clear grasp as to whether our idea is actually any good and whether it will attract a wide audience.

Wednesday 14 December 2011

The Godfather Opening Sequence



The Godfather is a film based on a successful book by Mario Puzo. The film chronicles the life of an Italian-American mafia family who are forced to confront multiple issues revolving around the criminal world. The notion of sophistication is prominent throughout the whole film franchise of The Godfather and is a typical feature in films which are based on crime drama.

This notion of sophistication can be seen throughout this opening sequence including the fact that all the men are wearing very smart suits and combined with the very sophisticated and intriguing music which plays at the start of the sequence and makes the sequence seem very urbane and erudite. When the film was made Marlon Brando was one of the biggest names in cinematic history and is thus one of the primary reasons many original people saw this film when it was released.

The use of very dark colours can be seen throughout the sequence which highlights a dark but equally sophisticated atmosphere and thus reflects the dark but intriguing characters which are shown throughout the films.

As the scene opens the audience can see a black screen whilst the infamous ‘Godfather theme’ plays. The music entices the audience and helps create a very dark and intriguing atmosphere.

0:11 is the first time dialogue can be heard, at first it is a voiceover however the camera gradually fades in so that a man’s face can be seen at 0:14 within a close-up which gradually zooms out so that at around 0:50 the shot is more of a mid-shot. The accent the man speaks with is a very strong Italian accent however his first sentence is “I believe in America”. This is a typical representation of foreign people following an ‘American dream’ type outlook on society. Also the use of the black screen whilst this first line is being said creates a generic feel that all Italians (or possibly all people) ‘believe in America’.

The man starts discussing how he allowed his daughter to go out one night with her boyfriend and her boyfriend’s friends only to find that she had been physically attacked and is thus in a great deal of pain, much to the man’s obvious dismay. There are also two very distinctive lights which appear opposite each other at around 0:40 and could resemble sinister eyes watching the man in the background. The ‘eyes’ become much clearer as the shot continues to zoom out, so much so that by 1:05 the ‘eyes’ are now a very clear and prominent aspect in the shot. The ‘eyes’ could be shown in the shot in order to emphasize that something sinister and dark I watching the man which could create a haunting atmosphere.

This, combined with the very chilling story about his daughter being brutally attacked creates a very dark atmosphere, the lighting of the shot emphasizes this further as the ‘eyes’ and the man are the only objects shown in the shot, this creates the sense that the man is alone, since the audience so far have not seen anyone else it anticipates them into thinking who the man is talking to and why exactly is he telling them this information and what he expects him to do when

Since the camera continues to zoom out the shot at 1:38, the shot now shows a mid-shot of the man who was originally talking and also a red desk (possibly indicating that danger is in front of the man or that the man in front is a royalty figure), and a hand of an unidentified man resting it on his face. The man begins weeping before he can fully finish his story; once this happens the hand suddenly moves and indicates to another man to bring the weeping man some tissues. This shows how he is fully in charge of the situation, the fact that the man does not need to use dialogue to indicate another man to deliver something highlights that he is in charge.

The fact that the weeping man is essentially pleading for the man opposite to help him and how the man does not show any emotion any distinct emotion could show that the weeping man is in a kind of aura state around the man opposite. The man proceeds to say that the men who attacked his daughter were set free thus causing him to visit Don Corleone (the man opposite). This indicates that Don Corleone is a criminal however the way the man talks about him such as ending his final sentence with the Don Corleone, this is similar to when people address royalty just instead of saying sir/madam he says Don Corleone, this (combined with the royalty-type furniture) highlights that Don Corleone is considered a royalty-type figure and clearly has a vast amount of respect around him. This is typical of many crime films with the head of the Mafia being seen in a very dark but respectable way, this resembles their character as although they are very dark and sinister they are greatly respected and have a vast amount of supporters. Don Corleone then asks what the man specifically wants from him, the man then walks up to Don Corleone until there is then a two shot at 2:57, the audience can hear the man’s heavy breathing at this point however they cannot hear any dialogue, this ‘secret talk’ is a very famous cliché of film (see Cinemassacre’s top 10 worst movie cliché’s link below) and is done to make the audience ponder exactly what has been said.

So far there has been no editing whatsoever in the sequence and thus means there is a very slow but equally intriguing atmosphere as the audience ponders who the men is talking to and at the same time are anticipating to see Marlon Brando in the film.

At 3:01 the first edit is made thus signifying the ‘reveal’ of Marlon Brando as Don Corleone, the camera stays on Marlon for roughly 12 seconds, the majority of this time Marlon does not say any dialogue, this could be due to the films of the time as not many edits were made with the technology of the time, very often there would be very long takes of each shot, a prime example would be Alfred Hitchcock film Rope which uses minimal edits. The long take of Marlon Brando simply looking on the floor could be done to highlight to the audience the ‘reveal’ of Marlon Brando as the head of the Italian mafia. There are then shot/reverse shots on both the men as they exchange dialogue.

The audience can see clearly at 3:19 in a mid-shot that Don Corleone is stroking a cat on his lap. Cats are very often used as pets for criminals; a prime example would be Blowfelt in the James Bond franchise who frequently strokes a cat. The use of the cat therefore signifies an evil but sophisticated character as cats are very small, delicate creatures and are often considered sophisticate due to the worship from Ancient Egypt.

From the shot at 3:50 it is clear that Don Corleone has a vast amount of light behind him whilst the man does not have much and is left in the dark, this shows how the Don is more heroic and has a vast amount of respect behind him whilst the man is unsupported. The Don the continues to say he will not help the man as he does not believe the man deserves it from him considering the man only visits him when he wants help. The man says he wants Don Corleone to help him with “justice” by killing the men who attacked his daughter however The Don says “that is not justice, your daughter is still alive”, this indicates that The Don has a kind of “eye for an eye” attitude which is typical of the people who are involved in the criminal world and also highlights a brutal realty towards the his views. Don Corleone implies that he is irritated by the fact that the man does not call him “Godfather”, this will later have an interesting effect as the sequence continues.

At 4:36 the man then says that he would be thankful if he made them “suffer” instead, once he says this he then starts to question how much he should pay Don Corleone, the Don then raises his head as if the man has suddenly caught his attention, there is then a long shot which establishes the room and is the first time other people are shown to be in the room, they are all wearing smart, black suits, this  again resembles their dark but equally sophisticated and respectable characters. As Don Corleone stand up there is another man at the forefront who also stands up, this could resemble how the man is becoming surrounded as though Don Corleone is circling him like a predator. Don Corleone then states he feels he is treating him with disrespect by offering him money to commit crime. This could indicate to the audience that The Don does have morals and sticks with them firmly, money is often thought of as an indicator of selfishness and evil and since Don Corleone refuses to commit crime for money highlights that he is the protagonist of the film and also makes him more likeable to the audience as they can see he is not selfish.

He then starts to say that he will now make the men suffer but on the condition that the man will have a call from him in the future asking him to do ‘a job’ for him and he must accept. At 5:36 the man finally calls the Don Corleone “Godfather” whilst slightly bowing his head, this indicates how he has listened to Don Corleone and how Don Corleone has asserted his authority onto the man. The use of the man slightly bowing his head indicates that he considers Don Corleone royalty. This shows how the mafia had so much power in their prime and the respect people had for them despite the horrific, dark effects they had on society. I think this would be very good to include in our project involving some sort of character development by highlighting the vulnerability of one character and the authority of another by simply having the vulnerable man change the name he calls the man with authority, instead of "Gadfather" this could easily be changed to "sir" or "madam" and will both create the same or at least a similar effect.



Here is a shot taken from 1:19, if you look very closely there are two orange dots on the left side of the image which could resemble eyes, i discussed the impact and use of this earlier in the blog.


Here is an image taken from 3:02 just after the 'reveal' of Marlon Brando in the role of Don Corleone 

Here is an image taken from 3:13, as you can see half the room is very dark highlighting the sinister characters whilst the furniture in the other half of the shot are more sophisticated and respectable with a 'royalty' red used across the carpets indicating the sophistication of the family. Very rich, old-fashioned furniture indicates again the sophistication but also the old-fashioned views of the family, the old-fashioned views will link to the "eye for an eye" type belief of Don Corleone which I referred to in the blog. 

Tuesday 13 December 2011

Representation

After conducting research on 3 different opening sequences I can currently say the representation of crime drama tends to focus on the social class area combined with aspects of regional identity. I know this primarily through my research from the TV show Sherlock and Casino Royale. Both in these instances there was a clear representation of social class, typically the working class are deemed reckless, clueless and commonly idiotic or on occasion have shown elements of 'street smarts' such as in Snatch wherein gypsies appear to 'outdo' the other classes around them. The upper class are typically redeemed to be either overly 'posh' and eccentric or sophisticated and erudite, this can however mean that typical villains are shown to be very sophisticated, this is notable in numerous films from the James Bond franchise in which typical characteristics of the villains is the archetype of sophistication. The middle class tend to be the primary focus of 'everyday' characters which means the common heroic characters are often middle class or upper class while villainous characters are either working class or upper class. Very often in films (specifically films from film noir) of crime drama it appears that the heroic characters often have a clear sense of 'right and wrong' however they are typically shown to be reckless and have some sort of 'dark side' towards their character, for instance a character maybe a detective who is very passionate about his job to the point that he will do almost anything to solve a case, without considering any health and safety regulations or taking into account what could happen to other people around him. In terms of gender, crime films tend to focus more on representing women as very weak, feeble or as a 'damsel in distress' whilst the men are often shown to be very heroic, tough and intelligent but often have a very dark past or are in a great deal of stress over something around their life. This can be seen in crime films such as Scarface in which the male character is exceedingly protective over his sister, to the point where he kills his best friend just to ensure his sister does not have a boyfriend who is involved in crime. Sometimes the male heroic characters are actually criminals however these characters often have a clear distinction of right and wrong and very often have certain limits such as ensuring no one is killed who does not deserve to be so that common civilians are never harmed. Scarface is a prime example of this as the main character is shown to be a villain throughout and even calls himself "the bad guy" however there is a very famous scene in Scarface where the main character very aggressively refuses to kill two young kids in a car which ultimately results in his own death by the end of the film, this shows that the main character is not purely evil as even though he does do very horrific things he does have his limits and can see what is right and wrong.  Another representation that is often shown in crime films is the representation of age, very often young characters are shown to be reckless and do not have a clear image as to what they should do and what they shouldn't. This corresponds with the older people shown as they are typically shown to be very sophisticated, organised and have a clear understanding about what their role is. For example there maybe a scenario in a police station where a young new recruit has just enrolled and is forced to work with an older policeman that has been working at the police station the majority of his life, typically the representation here would show the young recruit as clueless who consistently gets involved in cases which he does not know how to handle whilst the older recruit has to mentor him and teach him about right and wrong. I think some of these representations would be interesting to use in our final project, specifically the 'troubled' detective type figure, this would be interesting to use/subdue as it is very typical of crime films and subverting the representation in some way could be very interesting to use. The representation of women being overpowered by men could be interesting to show in our project as it could be easier to show this as opposed to other representations. In terms of age it would be very difficult to show as all of the members in our group are of a similar age so differentiating between age groups would be hard unless we will be able to allow auditions of much older people. I think differentiating between social class would be good as it is an area which is very often explored in crime films, the fact that the middle class and upper class are very typically shown to be heroic whilst the working class tend to be more reckless could be interesting to subdue which will mean if we were to subdue this it would involve using the middle class as the villains whilst the working class are more heroic. My original idea was to show the working class as innocent and overpowered by the middle class, this could potentially stay the same as if the working class are shown to be innocent then it would naturally make them seem more heroic.

Sunday 11 December 2011

Film Noir

By definition, film noir is a term used in order to establish stylish Hollywood crime dramas. The period in which these film's are generally thought to have been made is between the 1940s and the 1950s. Film noir of this era is often associated with black-and-white imagery which is often combined with links to German Expressionist film's such as The Cabinet of Dr.Caligari and Nosferatu. These film's often use disoriented shadows and shapes in order to emphasize certain moods and atmosphere's towards the audience. Many of the typical stories and much of the attitude of classic noir derive from the crime fiction that emerged in the United States during the Great Depression.

This is very interesting in terms of our project as we are doing crime drama. I now think it would be very useful for us to use black and white in some part of our project in some way. This way we will be able to discuss how typical film noir helps create certain atmosphere's which are transcribed onto the audience, we will also be able to discuss the links between this and the German Expressionist film's of the silent era of film. 

Sherlock Series 1. Episode 3 Opening

http://www.megavideo.com/?d=CM2FTXNX (0:00-1:48)
I could not find a link to the actual opening sequence of episode 3 in the BBC drama Sherlock, however I did find this link which actually encompasses the whole episode, I have highlighted in bold beside the link the time range of the opening sequence so when I analyse the clip you should be able to tell the opening sequence ends at 1:48 once the scene fades and the opening credits start playing. Please NOTE that this particular link will only play the video for one hour and will thus not play the full programme (unless the user is willing to wait an extra hour once the video stops playing) as the full programme plays for one and half hour.

Before any specific shots are shown, the clip begins with a black screen whilst very sophisticated, intriguing non-diegetic music is played in the background. This music is very similar to the title theme of the programme and thus resembles it well whilst also keeping the audience intrigued. The audience are then shown some text stating "Minsk, Belarus" obviously highlighting the setting in which the characters are in at this point in the programme. The camera then pans smoothly from a black screen thus revealing a very rundown prison at 0:05. The use of the camera pan creates a sense that the audience is peering over the scene similar to Lucky Number Slevin in the elevator scene.

The fact that this rundown prison is in Belarus already highlights the representation that Eastern European countries are very deprived and therefore very rough and unhygienic. As the camera pans across the prison the audience can see a long shot of Sherlock talking to a prisoner about his situation, shot/reverse shots are made during the conversation to reflect on the dialogue. It is clear that Sherlock and the prisoner are the only two people in the room combined with the prison being notably dark and damp creates the sense of dread and incomprehension towards the audience.

Sherlock is wearing very dark but equally sophisticated and erudite clothing; this is done to highlight Sherlock’s character as he is a very intelligent person but can also be dark and malicious at times but remains heroic and good in order to find injustice. The prisoner is wearing typical prison, orange overalls however the lighting on his clothes is very interesting as they are clearly in the dark thus emphasizing that the man is a very dark, probably sadistic character. As the two start exchanging dialogue there is a shot/reverse shot on both the two characters within two close-ups of the two characters.

From the dialogue it is clear that Sherlock has a very posh and deep accent whilst the prisoner has a typical cockney accent clearly showing that the working class are undermined by the upper class. The use of the prisoner having a working class accent also represents that the working class are the criminals in society whilst the upper class are the detectives. Throughout the conversation Sherlock consistently corrects the prisoner’s sentences showing how the upper class are clearly more intelligent than the working class. Eventually the prisoner becomes so agitated about Sherlock he starts violently hitting his hand on the table clearly showing again how the working class are very violent, earlier in the conversation it is made clear that the prisoner is in prison because he murdered his girlfriend showing mans empowerment of women but also reinforces how the working class people are clearly more horrifically violent.

From the lighting it is also notable that Sherlock is always shown with a brightly lit face whilst the prisoners face can be seen but is notably much darker than Sherlock’s showing how the working class are far more evil and sadistic whereas the upper class are much more calm and heroic. Sherlock finds out through the dialogue that the prisoner admits he stabbed his girlfriend repeatedly and thus leaves him in the prisoner where he is expected to be “hanged” as punishment, Sherlock clearly has a very prudish and cocky look on his face as he leaves, this clearly shows how the upper class has ‘won the argument’ over the working class.


Here is an image taken from the dialogue scene in which Sherlock and the prisoner are discussing the prisoner's situation. As you can see the room is incredibly dark thus creating a very dark and sinister atmosphere. The room is also very damp which resembles a very uncomfortable feel towards the audience.



As you can see here the prisoner is shown in very dark lighting therefore highlighting how the prisoner is very sadistic and sinister whilst Sherlock (shown below) is shown in very brightly lit lighting.



Sherlock here is clearly shown in brightly lit lighting which highlights how Sherlock is the heroic, heavenly character here whilst the prisoner is very evil and sadistic. The window in the background corresponds with the window shown in the prisoner's still (shown above), here Sherlock's window is fully shown showing how he has a very clear, relaxed mind whilst the prisoner's mind is very cramped and claustrophobic.

Saturday 10 December 2011

Lucky Number Slevin Opening


Here is a link to the opening sequence of Lucky Number Slevin. If you have seen the film then it you will understand that it can be difficult to describe the premise of the film without revealing the twist ending as a lot of the film is based on questions. One of the main themes of this film is the theme of identity, without revealing the ending the premise is about a man known as Slevin who is mistaken as a man that is in a great deal of debt with 2 rival gang leaders, both the rival gangs do not know that about the other wanting Slevin, and Slevin does not know anything about the two rival gangs in the first place which does make the film incredibly confusing for the audience, however this is all build up towards the twist ending. There is also a mysterious man known as Mr. Goodkat who interlinks between the two gang leaders and appears to have knowledge about every single person that is shown throughout the film; however the audience will not fully understand how he knows this information until the end. The theme of identity is brought up throughout many crime-dramas, most notably The Departed who uses identity to discuss the theory that just because certain people are often perceived in certain ways does not mean they fully encapsulate these ways and never show the opposite side of who they are. This is similar in Lucky Number Slevin because Slevin in the beginning of the film is very humorous and is often used as comedic value however he later changes and becomes more serious (specifically near the end of the film). In many ways this film could not be considered a crime-drama and more of a crime-comedy as throughout the first half of the film there are numerous examples of comedic elements, mostly through the dialogue and the story itself (often Slevin discusses his confusing situation with other characters in a very humorous way) however throughout the second half the film does become much darker and delves into more sadistic imagery and the storyline becomes much clearer towards the audience thus making it more of a crime-drama. BE AWARE that this specific link can falter when watching the video if you pause it, however you can combat this by simply refreshing the page using the F5 button on the keyboard.

You will notice that this sequence in particular is very short; this could be because after this sequence there is a very long flashback sequence which is unrelated to what is shown during the title sequence. I originally planned to analyse this flashback sequence as well as part of a different blog however so far I cannot find a direct link.

You will also notice that no main characters or dialogue is shown in this sequence, this is because the whole sequence is done to create the sense of mystery but also give the audience a sense of bewilderment, which is one of the typical emotions audiences typically gain when watching this film. I discussed the premise earlier for a number of reasons, firstly I because I felt it would make more sense when I start describing the features that are being shown and another reason is so that you can understand why these scenes are being shown within the opening.

As the title sequence opens the audience can see a fade in shot of a piece of paper with data concerning the film written on it. These pieces of paper are important in the actual film as they reflect the bookies who keep track of debts There is non-diegetic music being played in the background which is very soft and melodramatic, however it is notably very mysterious and very intriguing towards the audience, this instrumental music is played throughout the sequence thus highlighting in greater depth the mysterious value and effect it has upon the audience. There can be seen very faint images of random numbers spread across the screen, these resemble the bookies that are shown throughout the film and highlight the fact that the bookies are involved in debt collection.

At 0:11 the camera begins to pan down from the sheet of paper thus revealing more data about the film’s credits, this continues to happen until 0:14 in which this shot there can be seen a coffee mug stain on the sheet of paper highlighting that people may have been careless around this particular document as though it is not important, this would make more sense as to why Slevin’s identity is mistaken as though it is a very simple mistake. There is then a shot of two red lines which cross over each other, the use of red highlights the blood and emphasizes the danger that is shown throughout the film, the camera then begins to pan down thus following one of the red lines, there can now be heard indistinctive dialogue that is very similar to an announcer from a typical horse racing game, this reflects the bookies that are shown throughout the film, the camera then fades out into a black screen.

At 0:22 the camera then fades in to a shot of a phone in the middle between two beds. The colours that be seen within this shot are all very brown and beige, this could create a very bland sense and create a mysterious sense of bewilderment, at 0:30 the shot then fades out into black again, this emphasizes the bewilderment that was shown as the audience will not be able to understand why a phone is in the centre of the shot and why the shot has been used at all, this will intrigue the audience and make them interested to find out what the phone has got to do with the story. In the shot the wallpaper focused mainly on circular images whilst the bed sheets were much more ‘wavy’ and crimped. This mismatch of shapes is very interesting and also emphasizes the bewildering, confusion that is given towards the audience.

At 0:32 there is then another fade in to a point of view shot of the outside of an elevator as the elevator is going down, the shot starts moving in the direction of the elevator as though it is part of it, from the shot it also appears that the elevator is going down a small tunnel as though entering another world, this could reflect the two aspects of the film, comedy and drama who are both considered polar opposites. It also creates the sense to the audience of a predatory figure leering over prey as it smoothly moves forward as though it’s about to strike, this creates a very threatening atmosphere towards to the audience and emphasizes the drama and, when combined with the creepy eerie music also highlights a mysterious overtone towards the scene. Around the tunnel in this shot it appears very dark and wooden (through the wooden panels around the floorboards), this in turn creates a dark atmosphere which again makes the scene much darker, serious, mysterious, bewildering and also threatening all at the same time towards to the audience.

At 0:36 the scene then fades into another scene in which there is a long shot of a very old, seemingly rundown industrial car park as a man dressed in a beige suit walks across carting a book in his left hand. The car park is very beige and brown which reflects the beige imagery shown previously. The car park is very dark also with mould seeping from the roof and spread across the walls which creates a distinguishable dirty and rotten atmosphere but also creates a sense of isolation through the fact that the man is alone in a darkened place. Since the man is wearing a very smart suit and there is notably a very expensive sports car in the background it creates and reflects the earlier scene in which objects and scenery are mismatched which emphasizes a sense of bewilderment and confusion even further. The camera continues to pan across the room as the man is walking, it begins with a long shot of the man however once the camera pans the shot becomes an extreme close up of the man’s book he is carrying. The audience can see that the man is breathing through the air coming directly out of his mouth, this shows that it is a very cold day in which emphasizes resentful feel towards the audience.

At 0:52 there can be seen a point of view long shot from the elevator moving upwards that was shown earlier, this reflects the predatory feel and indicates to the audience that the man is being watched thus highlighting the threatening atmosphere that was hinted on earlier. From this point of view shot the audience can tell that a predatory-type figure is watching the man walk up to his car from a reasonably close distance, however the man does not notice him thus highlighting the predatory figure further as though he is a ‘silent killer’.

At 0:54 there is then a point of view shot taken from inside the man’s car, this only lasts for a few moments as very quickly 2 gun shots can be heard as the man’s face then smashes into the window of his car thus breaking the window in the process so there is then a mid-shot of the man’s face with blood shattered across the remaining parts of the window. Considering this sequence only lasts a few moments it is very effective in terms of shock value, which is actually a typical feature in horror films as opposed to crime dramas, it’s effective because the audience simply don’t suspect is as they had only small hints that there was a predatory figure surrounding the man as all the shots of the assassin were point of view shots. It also highlights the graphic nature, considering that there is blood across the screen combined with the fact that the man’s face shatters his own car window shows the audience that this film is very violent and will therefore be unsuitable for audiences under the ages of around 15-18 as it is very graphic here. This is typical in crime-dramas and very typical of many famous gangster films such as Scarface and The Godfather of which show a lot of blood and violence in their scenes in order to highlight the graphicness and the violence shown in the scenes. There is also an eerie of sophistication shown here, this is due to the fact that the gun clearly has a silencer attached to the gun, this can be heard through the sound the gun makes when it is shot at the man, also due to the fact that the assassin is never shown (in the opening sequence) it also highlights sophistication as the man is clearly very secretive and can kill people without the person knowing they are even in the same room. The notion of sophistication is typical in crime films such as Casino Royale (see Casino Royale Opening Sequence blog) and also The Departed, The Godfather among many others. The scene then cuts to a long shot in which the elevator is continuing to move upwards but this time the audience can see a man’s legs moving upwards with the elevator clearly indicating where the assassin was when he killed him, this however does not show the assassin’s face thus keeping the mysterious notion of the assassin.

At 1:06 there is then a point of view high angle long shot of the man’s dead body; the camera pans smoothly towards him creating a sense that the assassin is very smooth and delicate about his kills and moves very smoothly just like a typical animalistic predator. The assassin then leans over the man so that his shadow appears over the dead man indicating the dark nature of the assassin, he then picks up the book the man was carrying and walks off. The scene then quickly cuts to black.

Then the sequence quickly jumps the paper which was shown earlier during the credits. This time a number of red lines quickly move, link and travel through each other until eventually the camera pans on one of the red lines as it moves across the screen thus revealing the title “Lucky Number Slevin”, Slevin is written in notable red writing whilst “Lucky Number” is written in plain black writing, this highlights that Slevin has an eerie of danger around him, his letters are all in italics and are in disoriented capitals which reflects confusion and danger at the same time. It also corresponds the theme of identity as audiences will be asking who/what is Slevin and why is it written in this style as opposed to the other two words in the title which overall intrigues them towards the film. The scene then fades to black and continues to cover more credits surrounding the film for a number of seconds.

At 1:50 there is a shot of some unidentified people walking through a door into a man’s office. The room is full of wooden texture which corresponds to the wooden and beige imagery of the floorboards in the earlier car park scene. As the men walk in there can be seen multiple stars of David thus indicating Jewish overtones and also indicates that is very likely this scene is set in a synagogue which means there are religious overtones throughout this film. Using religion is a key element in a lot of crime drama’s, more specifically gangster films like The Godfather, most notably The Godfather Part 3 as in this film a mafia boss can be seen numerously visiting the Catholic church and at one point visiting the Vatican City to meet a priest. The scene then ends very quickly after this as it leads into the flashback soon after. Gender is a representation that isn’t explored in great detail here however it can be shown through the fact that at 1:59 once the people enter the room it is notable that they are all men wearing suits indicating that men are the dominant force and women are not involved in any such way around crime.


Here is a still taken from the opening titles when the red lines cross each other. As you can see the image is very dark and creates a very sinister tone towards the audience.

Here is a still taken from the shot in which the phone is shown in the middle between two beds. As you can see  the image bold's a vast amount of beige colours which creates a very bland but equally intriguing aspect towards the audience. As referred to in the blog I stated how the wallpaper boasts a vast amount of circular shapes whilst the bed sheets are have more 'wavy' imagery. This mismatch imagery creates a disorienting atmosphere towards the audience and creates a sense of bewilderment and confusion.

Here is shot taken during the elevator scene. As you can see the whole room is very dark thus creates a dark atmosphere. As the camera moves along with the elevator going down it creates a sense that a predatory figure is lurking over someone.

Here is shot taken inside the industrial car park (I referred to this frequently throughout the blog)

Casino Royale Opening Sequence






Casino Royale is the 21st film in the James Bond franchise and is considered a reboot of James Bond. The reboot was planned to make the character much darker and more realistic as opposed to the very ‘camp’ element that was used many years before.

From the opening it is clear that the darker tone is shown almost immediately with the use of black and white to create a very grim, dark and dreary atmosphere towards the audience. The use of black and white is very similar to typical film noir which makes the scene very gritty and serious. The use of black and white could also reflect the original setting of Bond from the book as this was set in the 1950s. Typical films of the 1950s were made in black and white which could indicate to the audience that this film is going to be more closely related to the book than previous James Bond films which is an intriguing concept and could easily keep the audience interested.

The scene opens immediately with long low angle shot on an unidentified building. The building looks like a typical working-class factory which makes the scene seem much more realistic as this is a very typical building; the use of the building looking like a typical factory could again resemble a 1950s setting. A black car then drives towards the front of the building at 0:08, as the car passes we can see titles saying “Prague, Czech Republic” which could link to the Cold War, one of the most remembered wars in history which again links to a 1950s setting, the Cold War is a war that is remembered for its secrecy and conspiracy, typically when thinking of the Cold War many people tend to assume the use of spies and assassinations, this reflects James Bond’s character and keeps the audience anticipated to see Daniel Craig (who at this point was the most recent actor to play Bond in film).

There is then a low angle canted mid-shot (0:10) on an unknown character. This is typical of classic film noir films such as The Third Man which uses these shots to create a very dreary, disorienting feel to the audience. The character is wearing a hat which is similar to a typical Russian Ushanka, this could resemble a kind-of East versus West feel to the audience as typically in films the Russians are represented to be sadistic and evil whilst the English/American people are typically represented as very heroic. The use of these canted shots is typical of classic film noir films such as The Third Man which uses these shots to create a very dreary, disorienting feel to the audience. Within the first few seconds lots of diegetic sound can be heard such as a car door opening and closing. This highlights the realistic approach that this film is aiming for. The sound is very quiet by this point and makes it seem very slow and dreary; this resembles the unknown character as the audience by this point is supposed to not be interested in him. The character then arrives in the building and enters an elevator, as the man is in the elevator there is another canted shot used but this time as a close up (0:20), the use of the man being in an elevator whilst this happens bequeaths to the audience the feeling of claustrophobia, the use of the canted shot resembles the disorienting factor that was made earlier to the audience.

There is then a low angle close up (0:22) on the room floor indicator which indicates what the character is looking at, it also resembles a countdown but in an opposite spectrum with the numbers going up positively rather than negatively as though the man is about to visit his death.

We then see the man walking across a room (0:26) in a long dolly shot. The room is very different to how the building looks from the outside. There is clearly a large amount of stairs and the whole room creates a very disorienting factor. It looks reasonably futuristic with the use of glass encompassing the walls to show the outside, the use of being futuristic could resemble that this film is not set in the 1950s to the audience. The lighting is very interesting here as everything appears quite lightly coloured other than the outside and the man. This creates the sense that the man is very sadistic with him being in very dark colours, the outside of the house being dark could resemble that the man has just come from the outside leaving the outside very dark and sinister which in turn resembles the man. As the man walks across the room the audience can hear his footsteps walking along the metal floor as the man gets closer to the end of the room non-diegetic sound can be heard to make the scene seem very ‘creepy’ but also intrigues the audience. There is also a very interesting use of non-diegetic sound at 0:29 in which a very faint sound can be heard which could easily resemble a gun barrel from a pistol being loaded. This could highlight that danger is getting closer or the man is walking to his death. The use of this sound in particular also makes the scene very disturbing and sinister and thus resembles the ‘thriller’ concept.

There is then a high angle point of view type shot (0:31) of a very dark room as the man walks in. There are notably a very large amount of shadows which create a very dark and menacing tone towards the audience. The shadows also do not correspond in any way to the objects that are shown on the screen. For instance shadow behind a typical office lamp is very strange and twisted. This is reflective of very old silent German expression films such as The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari which uses disorienting shadow throughout to express the mood and tone of what’s being shown on-screen. This is used in the same way here to simply create the disorienting factor and to also highlight the very sinister aspect that the film is trying to convey. As the man closes the door and walks across the room the audience can see (from 0:33) that the camera starts to pan from a high angle point of view type shot to a shot which is kind of like a split-screen point of view type shot with half the camera hiding behind a black pole whilst the other side watches the man walk towards to the other side of the room in a long shot. All this is done to create the sense of the man being watched. The use of the pan shot as opposed to cutting between different shots resembles the point of view of a character and since the audience will be aware of whom this character is it also anticipates them into seeing what the character actually looks like.

At 0:39 there is than a canted close up of the man as he looks across the room to notice at 0:40 that something is wrong with the scenery. We can tell this is how the man feels through the surprised look on the man’s face and also through the very eerie non-diegetic music made throughout this few seconds.

Before the man turns around suddenly the audience hear a voice. This character can then be seen as James Bond in a mid-shot at 0:46. The audience can see from Bond’s clothes that he is a very dark character as all his clothes are black. The only lightly coloured areas shown are on Bond’s face. This shows him to be a very heroic and dark character. The audience can hear from the dialogue that the man has been selling secrets of the British Secret Service; the man does not deny this statement from Bond which confirms that Bond is telling the truth. This highlights that the man is evil and sinister.

At 0:52 there is a very interesting long shot of the room in which there is clearly a large amount of equipment around the man whereas there is very little equipment around Bond, this resembles that Bond at this moment in time is not a secret agent as he has not earned his status yet whereas the man clearly has already earned it through all the equipment around him. Bond cannot be seen very well in this shot which shows that Bond is more inclined to ‘keep to the shadows’ and is therefore a much darker and more threatening than the man. As the man sits down in a chair there is a low angle close up on the man opening draw revealing a gun at 0:53 thus showing that the man’s intentions are to kill Bond.

At 0:55 there is a very interesting mid-shot on the man sitting behind his desk. At the forefront of his desk is a lamp in which appears to be leaning over the desk which could resemble how Bond is superficially leaning over the man as he is interrogating him.

As the man starts using dialogue it shows a shot/reverse shot of a close up on the man and the long shot of the room, the camera cuts between these shots as the man starts new sentences. At 1:19 Bond then starts using his dialogue. Bond’s dialogue here is very short as he is interrupting the man to show that he knows the man’s answer before he has said it. The very blunt answer using one word shows that Bond does not have much to say and simply wants to do his duty as opposed to the man who wants to talk.

As soon as Bond says the line “two” when referring to the amount of kills Bond has to make in order to achieve his double 0 status. There is then a jump cut to a flashback (1:20) showing the first death Bond made. Clearly the scenery is in a bathroom which could be reminiscent of other crime thrillers such as Psycho in which the most famous scene is the murder of a woman in a bathroom. In this flashback Bond is clearly shown to be fighting a man by aggressively forcing him inside toilet doors (breaking them in the consequence). This fighting scene is done to show that this Bond is going to be far more aggressive than all the other previous Bond’s and is also going to be far more realistic as a bathroom is a very average and typical place as opposed to the previous Bond films such as Moonraker in which a lot of the fight scenes aren’t realistic at all as they take place on the moon. As the men fight Bond is clearly winning over the man in terms of strength and fighting technique and whenever the two are knocked down (such as 1:28) Bond is always the first to stand up showing how he is superior to the man he is fighting. Bond in this fight scene is wearing a suit whilst the man he is fighting seems to be wearing quite a ‘cheesy’ Hawaiian type shirt; this highlights the sophistication of Bond and also his ruthlessness of his character through the fighting. The man wearing the ‘cheesy’ shirt seems quite typically working class and could show how Bond is triumphing over them thus representing the working class as aggressive people (as he is ruthlessly fighting Bond) but also as very unsophisticated and illiterate as the man fighting has no lines of dialogue other than groans from the fighting. At 1:30 the scene then jump-cuts back to the interrogation between Bond and the other man, the other man draws the gun that was placed in his drawer and holds it pointing directly at Bond, there is then a shot/reverse shot on Bond as the man exchanges dialogue before he suspects that he is about to kill Bond, however once the man pulls the trigger it is clear that the gun is not loaded as Bond has taken the cartridge out, this is taking directly out of many crime-drama’s where the villainous character holds a gun up to the heroic man’s face and exchanges dialogue before pulling the trigger and is often thought of as one of the most over-used clichés (link below to Cinemassacre’s top 10 worst movie clichés).

Once it has been established that Bond has the cartridge to the man’s gun there is another jump-cut to the flashback at 1:58 where Bond punches the man in the face forcing him to land and break a group of urinals. The man is then forced to stand up by Bond and is brought aggressively to a group of sinks filled with water in which Bond attempts to drown the man. This is clearly much more violent and sinister than in all previous Bond films and clearly shows the darker edge the film is trying to portray. The very violent scene where the man is being forcibly held in water drowning shows that the audience for this film would have to be around the 15-onwards mark as the film would probably be too violent and sinister for younger audiences. It would not be an 18 due to the fact that there is no blood shown in direct detail as the whole scene is made in black and white. As the man struggles the audience can see close-ups of Bonds face whilst very spine-chilling non-diegetic sound can be heard within the background, the sounds are very short to begin with but gradually become slower and much longer thus reflecting the man’s heartbeat as he drowns in the water. The close-ups on Bond’s face highlight the violent behaviour and ruthlessness of his character as he never takes his eyes of the man as he drowns as though he is totally focuses on ensuring the man is dead thus showing how Bond has no sympathy for him. Eventually the music stops thus indicating the man is dead, once this happens Bond simply drops the man on the floor and stares aggressively at the man’s dead body as though he is making sure in his mind that the man is indeed dead.

The scene then jump-cuts back again to the original interrogation, the original man tries to get emotions out of Bond by saying “made you feel it did he?” as though making killing seem like a sexual thrill, this could correspond with a villain from a previous James Bond film Goldeneye in which a villainous character kills people through sex as a form of her own sexual thrill. However Bond’s facial expression does not change thus indicating that this version of Bond is essentially emotionless and does not care about what people say. Before the man can finish his sentence for his next line of dialogue Bond immediately draws a loaded gun onto the man and shoots him subsequently killing him. As the man falls of his chair there is an incredibly quick point of view shot of the man at 2:52, the use of incredibly quick editing here resembles how quick the death of the man was, it also resembles a disorienting and confusing feel towards the audience which in turn resembles how the man would have felt as he would not have expected being shot so quickly.

There is then one final jump-cut to the fight scene at 3:00 in which the man who was thought to have been drowned quickly sits up and tries to shoot Bond however in a long shot James Bond turns and shoots the man emulating the famous ‘barrel shot sequence’ which is a typical feature in the Bond franchise.

The original man can be seen to be wearing a very posh suit and speaks with a notably posh accent which corresponds with the very sophisticated suit Bond is wearing during the fight scene and also Bond’s voice which is notably posh but is much deeper than the man’s. This shows how Bond is triumphing over the working class in terms of fighting and also represents the upper class as very sophisticated but also very pompous and dim-witted as the man did not notice that his gun had no cartridge inside it and was thus mentally overcome by Bond. This would overall show how the working class are aggressive fighters and how the upper class are sophisticated but can also be very dim-witted and overcome by very simple techniques. There is also a clear representation of men here as there are no women shown at any point here thus resembling how men overpower women in terms of government and crime.







An example of the canted close up shot in Casino Royale (as referred to in the blog).





Here is a similar canted shot taken from  a film called The Fallen Idol, which was made by the same director of The Third Man (as referred to in the blog), as you can see there are many similarities between the two and both clearly highlight the disorienting factor that they are both trying to perceive towards the audience.


Here is the shot I referred to in the blog when talking about the disorienting feel that is being given from the shadows. As you can see the shadow that is behind the light shade does not match the shape of the light shade thus creating a disorienting feel. 

 In the blog I stated that the previous image could bear links to the German expression film The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari as they both use disorienting shapes to create a disorienting feel towards the audience. Here is an still from the film The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, as you can see the vast majority of shapes in the background are very peculiar shapes and bold no resemblance to each other thus creating a similar disorienting effect on the audience.

Here is the image I referred to in the blog when discussing how Bond (on the left) is clearly shown to be kept 'in the shadows' whereas the man (on the right) is clearly in amidst of a vast amount of light. It is also clear how the man seems to have a large amount of buildings behind him which is similar to a famous still taken from Jaws in which the villainous characters have an array of equipment behind them whereas the heroic characters don't have much in their surroundings thus creating the feel that the villainous characters at this point have the 'upper-hand' over the heroic characters.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Klltwoa6glE - Here is a link to Cinemassacre's Top 11 Worse Movie Cliche's as referred to in the analysis (look up number 1 in the countdown for the main reference when concerning the analysis).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epxYm3OouQA - If the video on this post does not work, here is a link to the same video on YouTube.